Methodology

The research behind Lifestack.Every algorithm. Every citation.

Lifestack combines biometric data, calendar signals, and screen time into actionable intelligence. Every weight, threshold, and multiplier is grounded in peer-reviewed research.

Algorithm 01

Biological Capacity Score

A 0-to-100 composite representing how much your body can handle today. A battery percentage for your autonomic nervous system.

HRV Balance
40%
Sleep Score
30%
Readiness
30%

Why HRV is weighted heaviest. Heart rate variability is the single strongest non-invasive marker of autonomic recovery, correlating with stress tolerance, faster recovery, and better cognitive performance. 1, 2

Personal baselines, not population norms. Absolute HRV varies wildly between individuals. Lifestack normalizes every metric to your 30-day rolling average so the score reflects deviation from your own baseline. 3

1. Shaffer & Ginsberg (2017). Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 258.

2. Plews et al. (2013). Int. J. Sports Physiology, 8(6), 688-694.

3. Bellenger et al. (2016). Sports Medicine, 46(10), 1461-1486.

As seen in Lifestack

73capacity
HRV
Sleep
Readiness

Focus timeline sample

9:00
VS Code90 min
10:30
Slack12 min
10:42
VS Code48 min
11:30
Chrome8 min
11:38
Figma22 min
12:00
Calendar60 min
Focus Score
81/100

Algorithm 02

Focus Score

Measures the quality of your digital attention. Not hours logged, but how deeply you used them.

Deep Work
40%
Switching
30%
Meeting Gaps
20%
Context Depth
10%

23 minutes to refocusafter each interruption. Fragmented work increases stress and reduces accuracy. 4

Attention residuefrom the previous task reduces performance by ~20%, even when you believe you've fully transitioned. 5

7 switches/hour threshold.Above that, the switching penalty scales linearly. Derived from research showing knowledge workers switch tasks every 12 minutes on average. 6, 7

4. Mark, Gudith & Klocke (2008). CHI '08, ACM.

5. Leroy (2009). Org. Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2).

6. Newport (2016). Deep Work. Grand Central Publishing.

7. González & Mark (2004). CHI '04, ACM.

Algorithm 03

Collision Detection

Warns you when scheduled commitments exceed biological capacity. Your calendar should respect your body.

Severeload 70%+ + capacity <40
Moderateload 60%+ + capacity <50
Mildload 50%+ + capacity <60

Rooted in demand-control theory. Adapts Karasek's model: high demand + low control = highest stress and health risk. Calendar load is demand; biological capacity is control. 8

23% higher coronary risk. A meta-analysis of 228,394 participants found that the demand-control imbalance Collision Detection measures significantly increases heart disease risk. 9

8. Karasek (1979). Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285-308.

9. Kivimäki et al. (2012). The Lancet, 380(9852), 1491-1497.

Collision warning sample

Calendar load: 78%
9:00Sprint Planning1h
10:30Design Review45m
13:00Client Call1h
14:301:1 with Alex30m
15:30Strategy Session2h

Severe collision detected

Capacity 34 vs load 78%. Consider rescheduling Strategy Session.

Exhaustion calculator sample

$1,840/mo

lost to low-capacity work hours

At full capacity$1.00 per $1.00
Below 50 capacity$0.40 per $1.00

Based on $150/hr rate, 6h low-capacity work/week

Algorithm 04

The Exhaustion Tax

The core finding

Chronic sleep restriction to 6h/night for 14 days produces cognitive deficits equivalent to two nights of total sleep deprivation, while subjects consistently underestimate their impairment. 10

The 0.6x multiplier.Below capacity 50, every hour returns ~40 cents on the dollar. Derived from meta-analytic findings: sleep deprivation reduces cognitive performance by ~1 standard deviation. 11

$411 billion annually.RAND found insufficient sleep costs the US economy this much in lost productivity. Per worker: ~11 productive days lost per year. 12

You don't notice your own decline. Subjective sleepiness plateaus after a few days while objective performance continues to degrade. You feel fine. You're not. 10

10. Van Dongen et al. (2003). Sleep, 26(2), 117-126.

11. Pilcher & Huffcutt (1996). Sleep, 19(4), 318-326.

12. Hafner et al. (2017). RAND Corporation, RR-1791-VH.

Cross-Domain Insights

Where the pillars connect

The most powerful insights emerge where health, time, and finance overlap.

Sleep + Spending

5h

sleep

+$28

impulse spend

Sleep deprivation shifts financial decisions toward riskier choices, underweighting losses while overweighting gains. 13

fMRI research: poor sleep amplifies brain regions driving food desire while suppressing evaluative frontal regions. 14

13. Killgore et al. (2006). Sleep Medicine, 7(5).

14. Greer, Goldstein & Walker (2013). Nature Comms., 4.

Circadian Alertness
1-3pm dip6am10pm

The post-lunch alertness dip is circadian, not dietary. It occurs regardless of food intake and is amplified by poor sleep. Lifestack detects when low HRV coincides with this window. 15

15. Monk (2005). Clinics in Sports Medicine, 24(2).

Full Bibliography

1. Shaffer & Ginsberg (2017). "HRV Metrics and Norms." Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 258.

2. Plews et al. (2013). "HRV in Elite Athletes." Int. J. Sports Physiology, 8(6).

3. Bellenger et al. (2016). "Autonomic HR Regulation." Sports Medicine, 46(10).

4. Mark, Gudith & Klocke (2008). "Cost of Interrupted Work." CHI '08, ACM.

5. Leroy (2009). "Attention Residue." Org. Behavior & Human Decision, 109(2).

6. Newport (2016). Deep Work. Grand Central Publishing.

7. González & Mark (2004). "Multi-tasking Craziness." CHI '04, ACM.

8. Karasek (1979). "Job Demands & Mental Strain." Admin. Sci. Quarterly, 24(2).

9. Kivimäki et al. (2012). "Job Strain & CHD." The Lancet, 380(9852).

10. Van Dongen et al. (2003). "Cumulative Cost of Wakefulness." Sleep, 26(2).

11. Pilcher & Huffcutt (1996). "Sleep Deprivation & Performance." Sleep, 19(4).

12. Hafner et al. (2017). "Economic Costs of Sleep." RAND Corp.

13. Killgore et al. (2006). "Sleep & Emotional Intelligence." Sleep Medicine, 7(5).

14. Greer, Goldstein & Walker (2013). "Sleep & Food Desire." Nature Comms., 4.

15. Monk (2005). "Post-Lunch Dip." Clinics in Sports Medicine, 24(2).

Built on research. Designed for life.

Every algorithm improves as more research emerges. If you spot something we missed, we want to hear about it.